wallpaper dual monitor

wallpaper dual monitor. With special wallpaper for
  • With special wallpaper for



  • bassfingers
    Apr 22, 11:16 AM
    Longer, healthier lives with more time to spend with family? Sounds horrendous.

    we'll see how france looks when the interest on their debt exceeds their GDP. Paid vacation has to end sometime





    wallpaper dual monitor. a DUAL MONITOR wallpaper!*
  • a DUAL MONITOR wallpaper!*



  • bigjnyc
    Apr 26, 08:55 AM
    So who was that guy in the blue shirt who kept yelling at them to stop and kept getting in between them to stop it? was that not a McDonalds employee? or is that just being ignored in this crusade?





    wallpaper dual monitor. nature-wallpaper-dual-screen-
  • nature-wallpaper-dual-screen-



  • habibbijan
    Nov 16, 11:46 PM
    I'm all for this.

    For years AMD and Intel have played "leap frog" with one another in terms of performance. It's only recently that Intel has taken the lead after a lengthy duration of AMD dominance. Now that Apple has moved to x86, I see nothing wrong with Apple offering a choice of processors based on whatever brand can offer the best price/performance ratio. Say what you want about Dell, but they've recently starting offering AMD-based computers, and in my opinion this competition is good for the consumer.

    And for those of you stating that AMD processors run too hot, wake up and smell the coffee. You're about 4 years behind. Ever since Intel introduced their 90 nm "Prescott" core, their temps were blisteringly hot compared to comparable AMD processors. Of course, things are different now, and both AMD's and Intel's offering run quite cool in comparison to their previous generations.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Wallpapers - Dual screen
  • Wallpapers - Dual screen



  • toddybody
    Mar 28, 02:20 PM
    Im just waiting for all the fake MR iOS developers to post comments...:rolleyes:





    wallpaper dual monitor. Ultra Quality Dual Monitor
  • Ultra Quality Dual Monitor



  • PygmySurfer
    Oct 29, 01:12 PM
    Already replied to this, so take the time to read the rest of the posts. But to answer once more... I will take my PC to his house install there, mess with it and reformat once i take it home some days later. Like many use the same Windows install for more then one PC.

    This is a way to get around having to get a new copy of osx, because the law alows this where i live. But i'm not completely sure and will try to get more information on this.

    Just wish people would reply and try to help or explain, instead of immediatly trashing me... I'm trying to do the right thing, and if i have to buy th OS then I will. The reason is just to try OS X on a PC and for the sake of the apple experience.

    But hey, know you're all apple fanboys in here so maybe i should just go somewhere where people dont trash you for nothing...

    If you want to "try out" Mac OS X, what's stopping you from trying it out on your friend's computer? If you want to do the right thing, you won't be installing OS X on non-Apple hardware.

    Unless you're a corporation who purchased a volume license, using the same Windows install on multiple machines is illegal too, btw.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Dual Monitor Wallpaper2 by
  • Dual Monitor Wallpaper2 by



  • garry12
    Jan 10, 05:27 PM
    But seriously ANY Australian will tell you that Telstra is rubbish.


    I live in Australia and am on the Next G network and, to be honest, it's very disappointing. Coverage drops in and out even in very built up areas. I can't comment very much about the internet because I try to avoid using it as much as I can due to the insane amount of money Telstra charges.

    Hopefully Telstra introduce this at a reasonable price. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was between $600 - $700.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Dual monitor backgrounds 3
  • Dual monitor backgrounds 3



  • *LTD*
    Mar 28, 09:49 PM
    1) Do you want to make things that are "insanely great".

    or

    2) Do you want to make the most amount of money?



    One follows the other. The two aren't mutually exclusive. Apple's current products *are* insanely great. Just ask the people standing in line.

    Game developers. World of Warcraft. Adobe. Microsoft. All of these developers not only do not distribute on the App Store but can not due to the App Store's TOS. I like the App Store but the control/terms keep a lot of great programs (like World of Warcraft, which one the Apple Design Award multiple times I think) out.

    It'll be their loss, especially since competitors like MS will follow suit and introduce a similar distribution model. Eventually everyone will be in the game, for the the simple reason that they'd like to duplicate Apple's success.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Vista only: Dual monitor
  • Vista only: Dual monitor



  • RebeccaL
    Apr 30, 07:28 AM
    I hope they go back to the rounded buttons. The new square ones are too windows-like. Also that new iCal interface looks like crap.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Dual Monitor Wallpapers,
  • Dual Monitor Wallpapers,



  • tbobmccoy
    Mar 24, 04:16 PM
    Personally, I liked OS X 10.4 the best. My first Mac OS and I'll always have a special place in my heart for Tiger :cool:





    wallpaper dual monitor. dual screen wallpaper 08 09
  • dual screen wallpaper 08 09



  • JayMysterio
    Dec 6, 07:59 PM
    the kill streak rewards are so low because its practically impossible to get more then 11 kills in one game with the ****** spawns. (unless you get lucky) 25 was feasible in Modern Warfare because it was a much better game and strategic players who knew how to play could get 25 kills cause they were fighting dip *****. in Black Ops everyone (dip ***** and good players alike) seems to be forced into the same run and gun strategy.

    This goes back to Treyarch's seeming desire to reduce the trenched in camping snipers. The real reason that 25 was feasible was because of stacking killstreaks. If you've seen the vids of people getting nukes in record time, it was all based on opening grenade spam salvo, hoping that gets enough for a killstreak, working to a copter, which lead to a nuke. Not necessarily anything based on skill.

    Treyarch has wisely spaced the spawns far enough so opening grenade spams don't work ( unless it's Nuketown and the opposing team runs as a pack into a rolling holy frag grenade ), so if one does lucky with the opening it only leads to an RC XD or perhaps a SAM turret ( hardline pro changing of it is becoming tired, but they claim a fix is coming ), but no cheap additions to a more lethal killstreak.

    The spawning issue which is infuriating at times, but does have a point. It completely destroys camping. Treyarch seemed to make a decision to nerf the whole snipe/camp thing, making sniping more difficult, and camping a risky & questionable proposition. Running & gunning is the way Black Ops seems to go, if you want to camp, stack killstreaks, modern warfare is the way to go. The amount of times I have seen someone going XX kills & 0 deaths I can count on one hand, while in MW2 I had done it quite a few times.

    I think Black Ops has become a nice alternative, and not just a continuation of modern warfare. It gives players choices.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Dual Monitor Wallpaper Mac
  • Dual Monitor Wallpaper Mac



  • Mac'nCheese
    Apr 25, 05:35 PM
    The video was hard to watch and saddens me more because a double minority (a black woman) should know better. The irony of this beating should be lost on no one.

    You would think that; however one could argue that black Americans don't repay the goodwill done towards their causes by standing up for other minorities. In fact, you could say that they do the opposite and use other minorities as scape goats for their problems. You could say that but then everyone would just call you a racist.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Ultra Quality Dual Monitor
  • Ultra Quality Dual Monitor



  • nylonsteel
    Mar 25, 05:18 PM
    King Tiger or Tiger II for the next series of Tiger names please
    Panther II would be cool to
    Just dont name it Elephant - last seen burning at Kursk





    wallpaper dual monitor. 40 Awesome Dual Screen
  • 40 Awesome Dual Screen



  • PygmySurfer
    Oct 29, 01:13 PM
    There big time investors also won't take 'just because' as an answer to why Apple won't license there OS, if the growth stops than there is no alternative.

    They will take "because it'll kill Apple's hardware business, which is where Apple makes most of their money" as an answer, however.

    Apple's interests lie in selling high-margin solutions, not bottom-of-the-market extremely low margin PCs.

    Think of Dell as Ford, and Apple as BMW.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Wallpapers - Dual screen
  • Wallpapers - Dual screen



  • slabbius
    Nov 24, 07:31 PM
    nah. they're just updating the mb/p line





    wallpaper dual monitor. Dual monitor backgrounds 4
  • Dual monitor backgrounds 4



  • hobo.hopkins
    Mar 28, 04:46 PM
    This not so subtle shift is a terrifying glimpse into the future of our beloved OSX.

    That is so crazy it's ridiculous. There is no evidence to support your statement. Mac OS X is not headed towards the "walled garden" universe that everyone seems to freak out over. Apple's just giving people who don't know anything about computers an easy way to purchase and find applications.

    I do agree, however, that by not including applications outside of the Mac App Store Apple is diminishing the value of the award. I believe it is within their right to do so, although I don't like it.





    wallpaper dual monitor. with two monitor set-up)
  • with two monitor set-up)



  • jntdigital
    Apr 25, 01:43 PM
    he's not the only one still boasting a first-gen iPhone! ;)
    I'm still lovin' it!

    Same here! Still carry it with no case. But it is really time to send this one into retirement.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Dual screen Game wallpapers
  • Dual screen Game wallpapers



  • Rodimus Prime
    Oct 6, 04:25 PM
    I still disagree with you. The device is material. The network is supposed to be invisible. You're not supposed to notice the network. AT&T's service isn't great, but I'll put up with it to use the device of my choice.

    The mobile industry has a strange business model compared to other industries. You don't buy a desktop computer that you can only use on one ISP or a car that you can only fill up at particular gas stations (excluding electric). However, If these industries were to operate this way, I still think people would go for the product over the commodity.

    To me, and apparently many others, mobile service is just a commodity. Some may be a bit better than others, but in the end you're getting a comparable service. The devices, on the other hand, vary. And, yes, I still think the iPhone was game changing. All I remember before January 2007 were RAZRs and Chocolates. Unintuitive text-based interfaces with linear button-mashing controls in a hyped-up shell.


    I think your arugument would be valid if phones were not subsudized and you have to buy them at full price. Because AT&T in this case is paying Apple $400 per phone you should choose a network first.

    If ISP were footing the bill for desktop then Verizon add still would work but for cell phones most of the cost of the phone is paid by the networks. Not the other way around.





    wallpaper dual monitor. Wallpaper sizes. Dual monitor
  • Wallpaper sizes. Dual monitor



  • Thex1138
    Sep 29, 11:27 PM
    The prototyping lab :rolleyes:





    wallpaper dual monitor. Wallpapers - Dual screen
  • Wallpapers - Dual screen



  • BRLawyer
    Oct 2, 04:23 PM
    When will this hacking nerd do something REALLY positive and productive to the world?

    Last time I heard, his occupation was to break into companies' IPR without any legal permission to do so...not commendable, to say the least.





    Jaro65
    Aug 9, 04:35 PM
    I really don't want to sound like a naysayer, but "going green" has become so fashionable that I think people are ignoring the engineering realities. We want whizz-bang electrics and hybrids when a simple diesel would be much easier to get on the market literally today and dramatically decrease our national fuel consumption (and dependence on oil imports) while we work to perfect the next step in alternative fuel vehicles. One step at a time, people!

    Why are we letting Congress and the EPA block sales of diesels here that could be used in everyday cars in addition to series hybrids?

    I completely agree with your position that we should have access to the efficient and modern diesels in this country. It is so frustrating that we don't have a broad access to this technology and I very much look forward to a change in this area. So yes, that would be a great first step.

    At the same time, we should consider the fact that a combustion engine is nowhere near as efficient as an electric motor. Hopefully we will be soon be able to drive cars with diesel engines, while also continuing to improve the parallel hybrid designs.





    notjustjay
    Mar 7, 01:06 AM
    I think there are a lot of factors at play here.

    One is that virtually every other company not only has to compete with Apple, but with each other. So they have to cram the most features and specs they can into a product, while making as cheap as they possibly can, in order to stay competitive.

    For example, take a MacBook Pro, and find ways to make it cheaper: Well, we can replace the unibody aluminum with a plastic shell. We could remove the backlit keyboard. We could replace the glass touchpad with a cheaper part. Take out the Firewire port. Hey, look what's left: a cheap laptop. Everyone tries to get it cheaper and cheaper so they can outsell the other guys. Meanwhile, Apple puts in whatever they want and charges whatever they want, because they've built themselves up a position where they know people will still go ahead and pay it.

    Also, because of the tight competition, companies are afraid to take risks. Remember when the USB por had just been introduced? This was a real chicken and egg situation for PC makers. No PC maker wants to be the first to switch to all USB ports because (a) it will cost more money to put the new ports into the board, and (b) they know it will annoy customers who will have to buy all peripherals. Customers will simply buy the competing brand because it's cheaper. Now, someone eventually sells a PC with both USB and PS/2 ports so you can slowly start the upgrade trend, but it's slow for all the above reasons.

    Same for the floppy drive: nobody wants to be the first to ship without one. It would be seen as being "too different" and cause lost sales to the competition.

    Then comes Apple with the iMac and its all-USB ports and no floppy. You want an iMac? You're getting USB. You're getting no floppy drive. There's simply no choice about it. There's no competition, either, and Apple is already known for being more expensive so that's not even a factor. Apple decides they want to push the standard forward, and frankly you have no real choice about it (if you intend to stick to Apple).

    Then the market opens up (for USB) or perception changes (it's OK to not have a floppy drive) or Apple defines something cool that people copycat, and in all cases Apple's marketing engine claims credit for changing the industry. Repeat something enough times and everyone starts to believe it...

    And, to be honest, there's also lots of confirmation bias going on.





    Ugg
    May 4, 04:46 PM
    Which brings me back to my initial reply. A "Firearm" has ZERO possibility of injuring your child, until someone behaves irresponsibly. I am fine with a doctor providing a pamphlet of common household hazards and steps to prevent them, but I get the feeling this is not the case. I can too easily imagine the doctor going off on a tangent about firearms deaths statistics, etc...

    But again, the most important part: If you dont want your doctor "politicing" you, GO TO A NEW DOCTOR. There should NEVER be laws against what you can or can not say.

    Dude, you're clueless.

    I have a severe congenital hearing loss and it's really amazing how parents don't really understand the long term consequences of poor hearing protection.

    Just as in almost all other health matters, the more exposure to loud noises when young, the more likely a child is to end up with a hearing loss as he ages. Some parents do insist on hearing protection when using firearms, but I'm sure there are a lot that don't. Shooting guns without hearing protection is like taking a five year old to a Nascar race. Very, very irresponsible simply based on the noise level.

    I'm sure Dr Choi was speaking of the danger of firearms being discharged by and around children with a lack of supervision, but your tunnel vision when it comes to the health and safety of children is appalling.





    yellow
    Apr 13, 10:51 AM
    http://www.risikolebensversicherungvergleich.de/logos/asstel_full.jpg

    Looks like it should be the name of a cellular company in the US.

    "Asstel.. We screw you like no other." :)





    dethmaShine
    Apr 29, 01:16 PM
    Downloading...

    EDIT:
    Size: 1.17GB

    Title: Mac OS X Lion Preview Update